Which type of measures should be relevant to an EBP question in a systematic review?

Outcome measures are essential in the context of evidence-based practice (EBP) questions within systematic reviews. These measures provide information about the effects of interventions on health outcomes for individuals or populations. They help determine how effective a particular treatment or intervention is in achieving desired health results, which is the primary concern of EBP.

Focusing on outcome measures allows researchers and practitioners to evaluate the impact of healthcare practices, assess patient quality of life, and understand the overall effectiveness of treatments. This aligns with the goal of EBP, which is to use the best available evidence to inform clinical decisions and improve patient care.

While financial, process, and administrative measures are important in their own contexts, they do not directly relate to the effectiveness of interventions in terms of health outcomes. Financial measures are useful for understanding resource utilization, process measures examine how a service is delivered, and administrative measures deal with organizational aspects. However, none of these capture the success or failure of an intervention in achieving specific health-related goals, making outcome measures the most relevant to EBP questions in systematic reviews.