Which of the following best explains the difference between "primary" and "secondary" research?

The distinction between primary and secondary research is fundamentally based on the source of the data utilized in each approach. Primary research is characterized by the collection of original data directly from sources through methods such as surveys, experiments, interviews, or observations. This type of research allows researchers to gather firsthand information tailored specifically to their study's needs.

In contrast, secondary research involves the analysis of existing data that has already been collected and published by others. This might include reviewing academic articles, reports, or databases, where the researcher interprets and synthesizes previously gathered insights that can inform current studies or perspectives.

Understanding this distinction is crucial for selecting the appropriate research methodology depending on the questions being investigated. The nature of primary research enables unique insights that are directly linked to the researcher’s specific objectives, while secondary research provides a broader context and can help identify trends from published data. This fundamental understanding of primary versus secondary research is critical for effectively conducting and evaluating research within the field of Evidence-Based Practice.