What is a limitation of relying solely on expert opinion in EBP?

Relying solely on expert opinion in Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is limited primarily because expert opinions can be biased and may lack the robust empirical evidence that is essential for informed decision-making. While experts bring valuable insights and experience to the table, their perspectives can be influenced by personal beliefs, experiences, or conflicts of interest, which may skew their conclusions.

In contrast, EBP prioritizes the integration of the best available evidence, which is typically derived from systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses. These sources provide a more comprehensive and objective basis for clinical decisions, reducing the risk of bias that comes with relying on a single expert's viewpoint. Thus, while expert opinion can be a useful part of the decision-making process, it should not be the sole source of guidance in EBP, as it does not ensure the same level of validity and reliability that comes from evidence grounded in systematic research.