In systematic reviews, how are the results typically categorized?

Prepare for the EBP Evidence Appraisal Test. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions with detailed explanations. Enhance your skills and readiness for the exam!

In systematic reviews, results are typically categorized into qualitative and quantitative types. This distinction is important because it reflects the nature of the data and the types of analyses conducted.

Qualitative results often come from studies that explore themes, experiences, or concepts through methods such as interviews, focus groups, or open-ended surveys. This type of data provides rich, contextual insights but does not lend itself to numerical analysis.

Quantitative results, on the other hand, derive from studies that generate numerical data, which can be analyzed statistically. These studies often involve measurements, tests, and surveys that yield data on variables that can be quantified, allowing for comparisons, calculations of effect sizes, and the testing of hypotheses.

By categorizing results in this way, systematic reviews can synthesize diverse evidence, providing a comprehensive understanding of the research on a given topic. This framework also helps in assessing the strength and applicability of the findings, which is crucial for evidence-based practice.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy